 |
 |
| |
Appalachian State University, Boone, NC (2008-present) |
| BIO 6610 |
Advanced Seminar Current Research Topics (Global Climate Change) |
| BIO 3533 |
Economic Botany |
| |
Study Abroad: Tropical Ecology field course in Costa Rica |
| BIO 2400 |
Introductory Genetics |
| BIO 2410 |
Genetics Lab |
| BIO 2000 L |
Botany lab |
| BIO 3500 |
Economic Botany |
| BIO 3532 |
Tropical Ecology and Biogeography of Costa Rica (Field course, team-taught with Dr. S. Van de Gevel, Geography Dept.) |
| |
Directing Senior Honors Thesis and Independent Study Research |
| |
Columbia University, New York, NY (2006-2007) |
| EEEB W2001 |
Environmental Biology |
| |
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (2007) |
| |
Spatial Genetics: One-week workshop organized for Latin American graduate students (August 2007, Universidad Nacional de Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina) |
| |
University of Georgia, Athens, GA (1999-2004) |
| BIOL 1107L |
Principles of Biology I |
| BTNY 1220L |
Organismal plant biology |
| BTNY 3440 |
Herbs & medicinal plants |
| GENE 3660 |
Evolutionary Biology |
| PBIO 4650/6650 |
Plant Taxonomy |
| GENE 4960 |
Directed undergraduate research |
| PBIO 6720 |
Plant variation & evolution |
| PBIO 8120 |
Reproductive ecology |
| |
Conservation Genetics: Two-week workshop organized
for Latin American graduate students (May 2004, Universidad Nacional
de Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina). |
| |
Emory University, Atlanta, GA (1995-1999) |
| BIOL 141 |
Cell and Developmental Biology |
| BIOL 142 |
Organisms and Population Biology |
| BIOL 329 |
Coastal biology, Emory University
(two-week field course, 1995-2003) |
Teaching Philosophy
To teach means to believe that one can make a difference. A teacher can make
a difference by creating an intellectually challenging environment, in which
students are active participants and discoverers of new knowledge, rather than
fact-memorizing slaves and passive recipients of rules and grades. Students
should leave school with feelings of increased self-esteem, accomplishment,
and the ability to look at the world critically and analytically with increased
curiosity.
What are the objectives of my teaching?
I strive to help my students achieve their goals, as well as to set their goals.
I strive to guide them to embrace learning as a natural lifelong process, to
reinforce a notion that education is the key to a successful and meaningful life.
I encourage students' natural curiosity and assist them to gain a broad-based
view of how the world works (as opposed to isolated bits and pieces of factual
knowledge). I make an effort to foster logical and creative thinking that will
serve students beyond the classroom, to make them aware of current scientific
questions and their social implications, to promote scientific literacy, to become
better citizens.
How do I achieve my goals as a teacher?
A solid understanding of the subject is a prime prerequisite of successful teaching.
To gain the respect of the students, I must demonstrate that I have something
valuable to teach them. A good teacher needs to have a firm grasp of the material
covered in the class, beyond the scope of the textbook, as well as pedagogical
knowledge. This knowledge should stem from one’s research, reading, participating
in professional meetings, workshops and the active exchange of knowledge between
colleagues.
One of the biggest challenges is to motivate students to learn. In this respect,
the most important tenets are the teacher’s enthusiasm and making the subject
matter relevant. Together with the knowledge, the teacher’s enthusiasm
is the best way to generate interest in students. I have observed that my enthusiasm
for the subject matter and for learning in general is contagious, and it provides
much of the students' motivation. Motivation of students can be generated if
I as a teacher take personal interest in students and demonstrate that they,
too, have things to teach me. In addition, to keep students interested, the subject
matter must be relevant to their interests, to their lives, to the world outside
of the classroom. The first day of class is most critical to draw students' interest.
I have adopted a strategy of one of my former professors who begins the introduction
of an undergraduate Evolutionary Biology course, (typically attended by more
than 150 students), not by the usual review of the syllabus, rules, grading,
and attendance policy. Instead, he provides an overview of the history of HIV,
its biology, introduction to the US and its spread, our attempt to find a vaccine,
explains why some treatments are more successful than others or why some people
are affected more than others. Students are immediately drawn in without any
suspicion that they are learning the basic laws of population genetics, natural
selection and adaptation or about the use of molecular markers to reveal history
of a disease. Only then, is this group of captivated students presented with
the syllabus and logistics of the class. They leave excited to come back to learn
more.
In the classroom, I have adopted one of the oldest approaches to keep students
actively involved: the Socratic method. Although hardly novel, this teaching
tactic is powerful in fostering critical thinking. It allows one to develop engaging
ways of presenting material and retains the students' curiosity. While continually
inquiring into the subject, I can question goals and purposes, inquire whether
we have relevant data and information, examine the assumptions made, consider
alternative points of view, ask questions to trace implications and consequences
of what students are saying. Although this approach may be challenging to a teacher
who needs to prepare stimulating questions and be prepared to think on "one's
feet" when dialogue moves into an unexpected direction, it does keep students
involved. For me as a teacher, it allows continuous insights into student views,
their attitude in the class, and provides feedback as to what understanding the
students are gaining.
While Socratic teaching promotes critical thinking in the form of discussions,
the importance of writing as a tool to practice critical thinking cannot be understated.
I base my teaching on the belief that the best way to teach science is to do
science. While the process of taking notes combined with class discussion is
valuable, the real learning process comes through one's own effort, problem solving
and writing. My responsibility is to provide a framework in which learning can
take place. I often assign problem sets based on recently published studies.
In all classes, no matter what the subject, writing is an essential part of the
course. I encourage students to hand in outlines and rough drafts. It really
doesn't matter how much factual knowledge students possess if they can't use
it to solve problems and communicate ideas effectively.
What I believe constitutes effective teaching is derived from my experiences
and expectations as a student and as a teacher, and it is continuously evolving.
I have come to realize that students will ultimately learn what we examine. If
we test facts, they will learn facts, soon to be forgotten. I aim to teach students
how to use tools and resources to acquire further information - particularly
important in any rapidly growing field. I still have much to learn about teaching,
but I will always view the essence of teaching as mutual learning – the
best way to learn is to teach. I teach students. I teach myself.
|
 |