Introduction to Scaling


How do we go about assigning numbers to psychological events so that we can use those numbers to stand in for the events. How do I go about setting up measurement methods so I can end up making statements like the following:

I. Basic Fact: Psychology is NOT warmed over physics.

There is no instrument available that can measure color. All the available instrucments can do is tell me how much energy is present in each wavelength; what the total amount of energy is; how the energy levels change from moment to moment. None of this really can tell me what color a person will report experiencing. Color is psychology; wavelengths and energy level is physics.

Likewise, when I measure brightness, the instrument I use is the eye. What happens is I use a photometer and I adjust a light in the photometer until it looks as bright as the surface I want to measure and then I read off the luminance level from how I had to set the light in the photometer. Without me doing the adjusting the phtometer wouldn't work.

There is no instrument at all that allows me to measure lightness except by comparing the lightness (white to balck) of an unknown against a series of graded grays. All an instrument can do is tell me how much light is being reflected or the percentage of light being reflected; it cannont tell me how white or gray or black that surface will look.

The same principle holds for loudness, or flavor, or verticality, or whatever expeience you wish. A physicist measures stimuli but we don't experience stimuli we experience sensations and it is those that we want to measure.

II. Scales based on liminal measures: Indirect scaling techniques

Gustav Fechner developed his scaling techniques from a consideration of the jnd. In these techniques the subject is never asked to tell how big the sensation is, instead we measure the DL ("Are these two stimuli the same or different?") and by using some fancy footwork end up with a scale that measures the intensity of the sensation. They are indict methods because we approach the scaling of intensity inderectly--from the sensitivity to change.

(These figures adapted from someplace. I thought they were from Woodworth & Schlosberg, 1954. If you recognize them, please email me so I can credit the author.)

Weber's law, at best, is only roughly accurate and then only in the midrange of stimulaiton. It's sort of like Hookes' law in physics. Hookes' law tells how much a spring will stretch for each g we add at the bottom, but the law only holds for total weights that are neighter too large or too small.

Weber's law is only valid, if then, only when the standard stimulus is neither too large or too small. If we were to plot the size of the Weber constant for a wide range of stimuli we might find:

This figure shows that we require the smallest percentage change to detect a difference in a midrange of stimulation. If this were lifted weights, we might be outside the valid range when comparing postage stamp weights or weight-lifting barbells.

How does psychological Intensity increase with increases in stimulus intensity.

Its trivial to say that water tastes saltier and saltier as more NaCl is dissolved in it.

Y = mX

A constant increment in X produces a constant increment in Y. "m" describes the ratio of the two incrments.

Y = log X

A constant ratio change in X produces a constant increment (difference) in Y.

Y = Xn

A constant ratio change in X produces a constant ratio change in Y. "n" describes the ratio of the two sizes.

Every additional teaspoon of salt added to the water makes it taste the same amount saltier Every time I double the number of teaspoons the water becomes the same amount saltier. Every time I double the number of teaspoons the water increases its saltiness by the same ratio. For example each doubling of salt makes the water taste 10% saltier.

Fechner's answer is the middle choice: equal sensed differences correspond to equal stimulus ratios.


©2002 by Burrton Woodruff. All rights reserved. Modified Friday, June 7, 2002